Destiny or Choice? Deciphering Fate vs. Free Will in Shakespeare's Immortal Plays
Destiny or Choice? Deciphering Fate vs. Free Will in Shakespeare's Immortal Plays
 |
| Fate or Free will? Destiny or Agency? |
The Function of Fate vs. Free Will in Shakespeare's Plays
Perhaps the most intriguing and long-lasting theme in literature is the conflict between fate and free will, and no dramatist has examined this dynamic more thoroughly than William Shakespeare. Whether through the tragic fall of his characters or their times of triumph, Shakespeare is often concerned with the balance between the forces that dictate our lives and the choices that chart our courses. This concern is clearly present in such plays as Macbeth, Hamlet, and Romeo and Juliet. These productions encourage viewers to ponder how much human beings can control their own fates, and whether fate or free will is the supreme force.
Fate in Shakespeare's Plays
In Shakespeare's tragedies, fate tends to be an unseen, near-omnipotent power, guiding characters toward their destinies regardless of their actions.
 |
| Macbeth's Ambition- his fate and his choices.. |
Macbeth
In Macbeth, for example, the title character's meeting with the three witches is the catalyst for the ruinous events that ensue. The prophecy of the witches predicts Macbeth's ascendancy to power, and although Macbeth at first resists, he finally decides to kill King Duncan in an attempt to make the prophecy come true. But as the play goes on, it becomes evident that Macbeth is trapped in a web where destiny and his own deeds blend. The witches themselves hint that Macbeth's destiny is predetermined by powers outside his control. In Act 1, Scene 3, the First Witch addresses Macbeth, saying, "All hail, Macbeth, that shalt be king hereafter! " This prophecy appears to make him feel in control, but it also initiates his violent behavior, further down the road of self-destruction. Even though he feels he is controlling his destiny, Macbeth is still helpless against the witches' prophecy. As he is consumed by paranoia and guilt, it becomes clear that his efforts to shape his fate only achieve the exact destiny he had wanted to escape.
Romeo and Juliet
Likewise, in Romeo and Juliet, the idea of fate lies at the center of the tragic conclusion. Since the start of the play, the "star-crossed" lovers are already defined as destined to fail. In the Prologue, the Chorus presents the lovers as "a pair of star-cross'd lovers," suggesting that their fate is determined by the stars—an outside, unmanageable force.
Their fatal demise appears to validate the suggestion that no matter how hard they may struggle to pursue their desires or resist their families' wills, fate drives them to a certain doom.
Friar Lawrence is a central figure in William Shakespeare's tragic romance, Romeo and Juliet. He is a highly respected Franciscan friar who has a strong influence on the lives of the two title characters. Here's the breakdown of his role:
Confidant and Advisor
Friar Lawrence is a counselor and confidant to Romeo and Juliet. He's the one they go to for advice, comfort, and consolation. He's a wise and compassionate mentor who attempts to provide them with good counsel, usually a combination of spiritual and worldly wisdom.
The Marriage
Friar Lawrence consents to marry Romeo and Juliet in secret, hoping their marriage will finally end the peace between their rival families, the Montagues and Capulets. He is convinced that their love can be a strong agent of reconciliation.
The Plan
When Romeo is exiled from Verona, Friar Lawrence devises a scheme to prevent Juliet from marrying another man her parents have arranged for her to marry. He provides her with a potion so that she will seem dead, hoping to get her out of her arranged marriage and back to Romeo.
Consequences
Yet, Friar Lawrence's scheme finally goes awry. Romeo mistakenly thinks Juliet is actually dead and poisons himself in her tomb. Juliet wakes up to see Romeo dead and stabs herself with his dagger to be with him in death. The tragic outcome underscores the dire result of Friar Lawrence's good-intentioned yet faulty plan.
Themes
In the character of Friar Lawrence, Shakespeare investigates themes of:
- The complexity of love and relationships
- The aftermath of hasty choices
- The conflict between destiny and individual choice
- The influence of advisors and mentors on the lives of others
Character Analysis
Friar Lawrence is usually a symbol of wisdom, mercy, and good will. But his actions also illustrate the fallibility of human wisdom and the perils of interference in other people's lives. His character reminds us that even the best-planned actions can go wrong, resulting in tragic outcomes.
In summary, Friar Lawrence is a vital character in Romeo and Juliet, acting as confidant, advisor, and instigator of the tragic consequences that ensue. His character brings depth and richness to the play, accentuating the subtleties of human relationships and the capriciousness of fate.
Julius Caesar
In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, fate is instrumental in determining the lives of characters and the dramatic events that emerge. The phenomenon of fate goes hand in hand with the subjects of destiny, fortune, and the supernatural.
Fate as an Unavoidable Force
The characters tend to use fate as an immeasurable power that controls the lives of people. For example, Caesar's well-known line "The Ides of March are come" (Act 3, Scene 1) implies that his fate is sealed and he is unable to alter the course of events. Similarly, Brutus's lines "What means this shouting? I do fear the people, / Chose Caesar for their king" (Act 1, Scene 2) indicate that the destiny of Rome is predetermined.
Soothsayers and Omens
The soothsayers and omens in the play act as harbingers of fate, warning the characters of impending doom. A clear example of this is the soothsayer's warning to Caesar, "Beware the Ides of March" (Act 1, Scene 2). The omens, like the stormy weather and the lioness that appears, foreshadow the tragic events that are about to occur.
Character's Perception of Fate
The characters' perception of fate affects their actions and decisions. For example, Cassius's belief in fate makes him think that their actions are destined, and thus he is right in his conspiracy against Caesar. However, Brutus's complex understanding of fate makes him struggle with the moral dimension of his actions.
Fate and Free Will
The play asks questions about the relationship between fate and free will. Do the characters make their own decisions, or are they pawns in a greater game? The conflict between fate and free will recurs throughout the play, leaving the audience to wonder how much the characters' decisions are really their own.
Overall, fate is an omnipresent force in Julius Caesar that directs the lives of the characters and the tragic outcome. The investigation of fate by the play has significant questions about the nature of destiny, fortune, and the human condition.
Quotations:
• "It is not in the stars to hold our destiny but in ourselves." – Julius Caesar, Act 1, Scene 2
• This quote, uttered by Cassius, implies the conflict between fate and free will. It indicates that we are capable of controlling our destiny, but Shakespeare tends to complicate this ideal through the tragic fates of his characters.
• "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves." – Julius Caesar, Act 1, Scene 2
This quote overtly opposes the fatalistic ideology. It states that we have control over what we do and that destiny is not the ultimate power that guides our lives.
Role of free will in Shakespeare's Plays
Free will in Shakespearean plays operates at the opposite end of the scale, Shakespeare also insists a great deal on human agency. Although fate appears to play a strong part in determining the course of events in his tragedies, the choices that characters take—motivated by personal ambition, emotion, or moral principle—are as important.
In Hamlet, Hamlet's hesitation and inner struggle cause a delay that ultimately brings about his own death. Hamlet continually struggles with his own actions, thinking through the options and weighing what each might have as an effect. The turning point of Hamlet's question is his option to act or not act. In Act 3, Scene 1, he asks himself, "To be, or not to be, that is the question," a questioning about life and death and the likelihood of seizing the reins of his own destiny. In Hamlet's situation, his hesitation and use of inner contemplation cause him to meet his tragic end, demonstrating that free will—particularly the decision to act or postpone action—can greatly affect one's fate.
Free will is a central issue in William Shakespeare's legendary drama, Hamlet. The notion is deeply integrated into the storyline, questioning choice, fate, and moral agency.
Hamlet's Dilemma: A Struggle for Free Will
At the center of the play is Hamlet's tormented battle with his own free will. His father's ghost has disclosed the truth about his murder, and Hamlet is caught between avenging his death and moral values. This conflict within himself is a prime example of the intricacies of exercising free will, as Hamlet struggles with the outcome of his actions.
Fate vs. Free Will
The play tends to confuse the distinction between fate and free will. Hamlet's soliloquy ("To be or not to be") can be interpreted as a philosophical contemplation of the human condition, in which he asks himself whether it is more noble to endure the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune or take arms against a sea of troubles. This soliloquy questions whether our decisions are really our own or if they are predestined by fate.
The Role of External Influences
Shakespeare expertly investigates the influence of external factors on our decisions, which further complicates the notion of free will. For example:
- Hamlet's emotions: His anger, sadness, and betrayal dictate his actions, showing how our emotions can control our decisions.
- The command of the ghost: The ghost's call for revenge instills a sense of duty, indicating the conflict between desire and external pressure.
- Manipulation of Claudius: Claudius's deceptiveness and guile manipulate those who are close to him, showing how other people can influence our decisions.
The Consequences of Free Will
Ultimately, the play illustrates that using free will can have catastrophic consequences. Hamlet's decisions result in disastrous outcomes, including the fatalities of a few innocent actors. This is a reflection of the human condition, where our decisions can have far-reaching and unforeseen impacts.
In Hamlet, Shakespeare subtly examines the intricacies of free will, exposing the delicate dance between individual choice, destiny, and outside forces. The play poses fundamental questions regarding the nature of human agency and the repercussions of our actions, leaving audiences to consider the importance of free will in our own existence.
King Lear's Choices
 |
| Aging King Lear's Wrong Choices |
Similarly, in King Lear, Lear's own choices, and most notably his quickness in splitting his kingdom and banishing his daughter Cordelia, lead to his tragic fall. His choices, prompted by pride and ignorance, put him into a position where fate appears to have already been established, yet despite the fact that Lear himself chose the events to unfold, the play emphasises how free will, even when used without wisdom, can result in catastrophic outcomes.
In William Shakespeare's tragic play King Lear, the aging King Lear chooses to divide his kingdom among his three daughters, Goneril, Regan, and Cordelia. This is done based on the amount of each daughter can flatter and declare their love for him. This choice kicks off a series of tragic events.
Lear's choices are driven by his desire for flattery and affection, which ultimately leads to his downfall. Here's a breakdown of his choices and their consequences:
1. Division of the Kingdom: Lear decides to divide his kingdom into three parts, intending to give the largest share to the daughter who loves him most. This decision is based on a misguided belief that his daughters' professions of love are genuine.
2. Goneril and Regan's Flattery: Goneril and Regan, Lear's eldest daughters, indulge in excessive assertions of love in order to claim greater portions of the kingdom. Their false flattery deceives Lear, blinded by his eagerness for flattery.
3. Cordelia's Truthfulness: Lear's youngest and truthful daughter, Cordelia, does not indulge in flattery. She advises Lear that she loves him truly and that this cannot be quantified in terms. Lear misunderstands her truthfulness as insincerity and banishes her.
4. Repercussions: Lear's decisions set off a chain of tragic consequences such as:
- Loss of Power: Lear loses control and is ultimately betrayed by Goneril and Regan.
- Cordelia's Banishment: Lear exiles Cordelia, the only daughter who loves him with sincerity.
- Downfall: Lear's choice ultimately results in his downfall, physically and mentally, as he battles with the repercussions of his decision.
In summary, Lear's decisions are motivated by a need for praise and love that ultimately result in his tragic collapse. His failure to recognize through his daughters' insincere praise and misunderstanding of Cordelia's sincerity create the tragic course of events that transpire.
Quotations
• "Give me that man that is not passion's slave and I will wear him in my heart's core, ay, in my heart of heart." – Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 2
Hamlet's craving for logic and free choice stands in tension with the avalanche of emotions driving him to disaster. This appeals to the thesis of individual accountability in determining the course of his life.
• "When we are born, we cry that we are come to this great stage of fools." – King Lear, Act 4, Scene 6
Lear's observation of life as a "stage of fools" refers to the notion that our lives, despite how hard we attempt to orchestrate them, are still subject to the whims of other forces, but our choices lead to the tragic story.
Dynamics of Fate vs Free-will in Greek Tragedy & Shakespearean Plays
Comparing Shakespeare's Fate and Free Will to Greek Tragedy Shakespeare's use of fate versus free will has some similarities with Greek tragedy but also some differences. Greek tragedians such as Sophocles and Euripides often have characters trapped by fate in a way that appears completely unavoidable. In Oedipus Rex, Oedipus tries to escape the prophecy that he will kill his father and marry his mother, only to unknowingly fulfill it. The gods, in the guise of the Oracle of Delphi, appear to dictate Oedipus' destiny, regardless of what decisions he makes. The conflict between fate and free will in Greek tragedy is stricter; the gods are the main determiners of fate. Oedipus’ failure to escape his fate highlights the futility of resisting divine will. Similarly, in Antigone, the title character defies King Creon’s decree to bury her brother, believing her actions are in alignment with divine law.
She, too, is doomed by fate, as her defiance leads to her tragic death, showing how human agency is often at odds with an unalterable divine plan. This contrasts with Shakespeare's approach to free will and fate. Although clearly an important role is played by fate, players such as Hamlet, Macbeth, and Lear use their free will to bring about their own demise. Shakespeare appears to indicate that although fate may exert some circumstances over us, our human agency and choice determine what happens in the course of a person's life.
Characters frequently know their destinies, yet it is they who act in accordance with their own flaws and emotions that confirm or contradict their destinies.
Conclusion
In Shakespeare's plays, the conflict between fate and free will is one of the most intriguing parts of his plays. Although the force of fate is usually seen as being inevitable, the decisions of characters do determine their final fates. Shakespeare's characters are not often passive victims of destiny but active agents who decide and act on choices that result either in their downfall or salvation. Against this, we set the Greek tragedy's fatalistic vision of human existence. The Greek tragedy tend to imply that fate is inescapable and that humanity is subject to the whims of the gods, whereas Shakespeare provides a world in which fate and free will walk hand in hand, and human choices are critically important.
Finally, Shakespeare's handling of fate and free will challenges viewers to consider the richness of human existence and how we navigate our own lives.
Additional Readings:
• Macbeth, Act 1, Scene 3
• Romeo and Juliet, Prologue
• Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1
• Oedipus Rex, Sophocles
• Antigone, Sophocles
Comments
Post a Comment